ObserveOverviewActivityUsersTeams and Workflows
OptimizeOpportunitiesCoachingSkills
GovernanceModel AccessBudgets and ApprovalsMCP Servers
  1. Users
  2. Esme Nguyen
E

Esme Nguyen

esme.nguyen@northline.aiSoftware Engineer · Engineering
Tools used
ChatGPTClaude
AI spend (3 mo)$7,838.44
Savings$3,515.21

Esme's Token Efficiency Over Time

Score out of 100 · trending down

Esme's Monthly AI Spend

Spend down 11% while output volume rose

What improved Esme's usage

  • Stopped pasting full inbox context into every prompt
  • Started using the Code Review Skill
  • Added a user guidance file with preferred formats
  • Routed list-building tasks away from Opus
  • Used AI for reasoning, not deterministic spreadsheet math

Esme's top workflow

Code Review Assist

PR summaries, risk callouts, and suggested test coverage

E
M
T
N
$2,04439 convos

Esme vs Engineering

Efficiency vs. cost compared with teammates
Efficiency vs. Cost
EfficiencyToken Spend

Esme's user.md

user.mdVery Efficient
23 lines · under the ~40-line always-on budget
# user.md

You're an experienced Software Engineer working on product features in a TypeScript monorepo. You care about correctness, readable code, and shipping in small increments.

## Preferences
- Prefer small, reviewable diffs
- Code first, explanation only if asked
- Default model: Sonnet

## Project
- Package manager: pnpm
- Test: pnpm test · Lint before commit

## Do not
- Paste the full repo by default
- Rewrite unrelated files

## Load on demand
- @review.md · @debug.md · @tests.md
## Archive notes
- Full history of prior tool preferences from 2023–2025
- Long brand voice essay and sample paragraphs
- Every channel CTA variant ever tested
- Meeting transcripts summaries for last two quarters
- Deprecated model routing rules (keep for reference)
- Personal glossary of acronyms used once
- Copy of the onboarding checklist (also in Notion)
- Detailed API field list from an old integration